A legal dispute involving Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann’s aides has taken a new turn after advocate Nikhil Saraf received interim protection from the Punjab and Haryana High Court over demolition proceedings involving his farmhouse in Mohali.
Saraf had recently approached the court seeking a CBI investigation into corruption allegations highlighted in an Enforcement Directorate communication concerning government transfers, postings and other official dealings in Punjab.
High Court Steps In Over Demolition Action
Saraf moved the High Court after demolition proceedings were initiated against his farmhouse in the Majri area of Mohali. He alleged that he was facing harassment from state agencies following his decision to approach the court.
A special bench heard the matter urgently. During the proceedings, the Punjab government assured the court that no demolition action would be taken against the property until September 11. Officials said the proposed action was connected to an earlier notice issued in November 2024 and an order passed on September 2.
The temporary protection gives Saraf some breathing room while the wider legal dispute continues.
What Is Behind the CBI Plea?
Saraf’s public interest litigation concerns an Enforcement Directorate communication reportedly sent to Punjab’s Director General of Police, Gaurav Yadav.
According to the allegations cited in the petition, the agency had flagged a suspected network involving intermediaries and people connected with government officials. The claims reportedly include alleged influence over transfers and postings, government tenders, official approvals and other administrative matters.
The allegations remain subject to legal scrutiny and have not been established as proven facts by a court.
Political Pressure Builds Around the Mann Government
The case adds another layer to the political controversy surrounding the Punjab government. Bhagwant Mann has previously accused the BJP-led Centre of using central investigative agencies to pressure opposition-ruled states, while his government has faced criticism from political opponents over alleged corruption and governance issues.
The latest court proceedings therefore carry significance beyond the demolition dispute, particularly because they involve allegations concerning people associated with the state administration.
What Happens Next?
For now, the immediate issue is the High Court’s temporary protection against demolition until September 11. The court has not concluded that the demolition proceedings were connected to Saraf’s PIL.
The larger question—whether the allegations raised in the petition warrant a CBI investigation—remains before the court. The Punjab government’s response to the PIL could determine the next stage of the legal and political dispute.
